As sites ditch scores, should we ditch score-averaging for a RottenTomatoes-style
Sonicfan059 > 09-05-2018, 06:57 AM
Polygon announced the other day that they would be getting rid of their scores reviews which more and more sites are doing. I personally like this as it forces people to ACTUALLY read a review rather than quoting a score to prove how good a game is.
If you don’t know, Rottentomatoes tells what percentage of reviews are positive rather than highlighting the perceived point score average of the reviews. This is based on the principle that scores are highly subjective, so a more fair approach is to determine the probability that an audience member might enjoy the media being reviewed.
So 90 on Metacritic/OpenCritic means the critics average score was 9/10 or 4.5/5. A rather high bar to reach what we call “universal praise.”
But on RottenTomatoes, 90% means that of all the counted reviews, 9/10 reviews were overall positive or recommend the media. The average score of the reviews may be higher or lower, but the percentage helps you know how many people walked away liking what they saw. So a good movie that scores maybe 8/10 average, could land a 90% on the scale and thus we would know it was considered universally good by a different measure.