~Welcome to the Sonic Blast Community Forum~
Greetings stranger, it is an honor to have you as a visitor. Since we opened in 2006 our goal has been to offer the most authentic Sonic-themed community on the web for Sonic enthusiasts new and old. We do our best to provide the most unique features, best Sonic-themed designs, and have the latest news; always improving to cover all of your Sonic needs. Our community is full of friendly people and we hope you enjoy your brief stay but would be thrilled if you decided to join in on the fun. Being a part of our community is easy, quick, and absolutely free.

Click here to join our community and enter the land of Mobius as a =SB= citizen!
Citizens may log in to their account to participate in our land's conversations and access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
An interesting hypothetical rape case...
Topic Started: Sep 16 2011, 04:34 PM (888 Views)
Wallace
Member Avatar
Break out the L-word. The other L-word.
Not sure if this goes here, but whatever.

So I came up with this idea for a case a while ago and it was brought back to my attention today as we spoke of the subject in my Criminal Justice class...

The scenario is: a woman files sexual assault against a man. The man claims that he did have sex with her, but that it was consensual, and was not sexual assault.

My question is this: since he admits that they had sex, and this can be proven, how would her consent be proven or unproven? I have thought about it and it seems to me that the only evidence to either would be their own biased testimonies as the only witnesses.
Join Scott Pilgrim Month!

Posted Image

Posted Image

Character Code:
Offline Mini Profile
 
Replies:
Lord Bowie
Member Avatar
What is the difference between a duck?

Lie Detection is useless though because the Polygraph Test is not admissible in a court of law.

One thing I don't like is that two people can have consensual sex only to have one (typically the woman) claim rape far later in the future, and since the law is slanted against men in pretty much every way, the woman typically comes out of a case like that with at least something. Rape cases and divorce lawsuits, very typically, are won by the women, whether or not there is good reason behind it. It's easy money.
Saff Profile // Kam Profile // Sadistic Profile
Posted Image
Stop by my art thread ----------------------------------------------- SUPER DA PAGE
WARNING: Above Post May Contain Sarcastic/Harsh/Stupid/Offensive/Idiotic/Blasphemous Content. Deal With It.
______________
What's the difference between a champion and a challenger.. a challenger is trying to become, a champion became.
Offline Mini Profile
 
Amarok
Member Avatar
Fear the cold...
Bowie
Sep 18 2011, 04:02 PM
Lie Detection is useless though because the Polygraph Test is not admissible in a court of law.
That's basically what I was hinting.

Quote:
 
One thing I don't like is that two people can have consensual sex only to have one (typically the woman) claim rape far later in the future, and since the law is slanted against men in pretty much every way, the woman typically comes out of a case like that with at least something. Rape cases and divorce lawsuits, very typically, are won by the women, whether or not there is good reason behind it. It's easy money.
True, but you'd have to consider the case without normal prejudices. That's basically how the jury is selected, after all.[/quote]
Posted Image

The Original Characters

Ezekial, Alex, Zephyr, Neo, Pulse,Luna,Maya,Bob, Rose.
Ezekial Wolffe

This is just some super old artwork, worry not of it.
Offline Mini Profile
 
Phoenix-Saturn
No Avatar
i just wwant to be beautiful for this one month
Bowie
Sep 18 2011, 04:02 PM
Lie Detection is useless though because the Polygraph Test is not admissible in a court of law.

One thing I don't like is that two people can have consensual sex only to have one (typically the woman) claim rape far later in the future, and since the law is slanted against men in pretty much every way, the woman typically comes out of a case like that with at least something. Rape cases and divorce lawsuits, very typically, are won by the women, whether or not there is good reason behind it. It's easy money.
But that doesn't mean no one is ever raped ever.
i'm actually really sorry bout this
unfashionably late as alwways
Posted Image


Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

I... Am... THE WEREHOG SUPPORTER! MUHAHAHAHA! *Howl*

Offline Mini Profile
 
Lord Bowie
Member Avatar
What is the difference between a duck?

@Penguin - Yeah but you can never really expect a Jury of humans to be unbiased in one way or another..

@Yuuri - It doesn't mean that they're raped every time either..
Saff Profile // Kam Profile // Sadistic Profile
Posted Image
Stop by my art thread ----------------------------------------------- SUPER DA PAGE
WARNING: Above Post May Contain Sarcastic/Harsh/Stupid/Offensive/Idiotic/Blasphemous Content. Deal With It.
______________
What's the difference between a champion and a challenger.. a challenger is trying to become, a champion became.
Offline Mini Profile
 
Phoenix-Saturn
No Avatar
i just wwant to be beautiful for this one month
No. But I thought for this case it was actually a rape.
i'm actually really sorry bout this
unfashionably late as alwways
Posted Image


Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

I... Am... THE WEREHOG SUPPORTER! MUHAHAHAHA! *Howl*

Offline Mini Profile
 
Lord Bowie
Member Avatar
What is the difference between a duck?

"My question is this: since he admits that they had sex, and this can be proven, how would her consent be proven or unproven? I have thought about it and it seems to me that the only evidence to either would be their own biased testimonies as the only witnesses."

The scenario is that she submitted a lawsuit saying one thing and he is saying another.. whether or not it really was a rape was not specified because we're trying to prove one way or another. Despite how hard that may actually BE to prove it won't necessarily matter.. I've seen and heard of women "crying wolf" and getting money out of innocent guys pockets just cause the way the law works, and the way the jury works, it's far too easy.

My counter to the question, do you even have to PROVE anything for the guy to be found guilty ANYWAY?
Saff Profile // Kam Profile // Sadistic Profile
Posted Image
Stop by my art thread ----------------------------------------------- SUPER DA PAGE
WARNING: Above Post May Contain Sarcastic/Harsh/Stupid/Offensive/Idiotic/Blasphemous Content. Deal With It.
______________
What's the difference between a champion and a challenger.. a challenger is trying to become, a champion became.
Offline Mini Profile
 
Phoenix-Saturn
No Avatar
i just wwant to be beautiful for this one month
Well, it's really devastating to both parties.

Also, not all rape is male-on-female.
i'm actually really sorry bout this
unfashionably late as alwways
Posted Image


Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

I... Am... THE WEREHOG SUPPORTER! MUHAHAHAHA! *Howl*

Offline Mini Profile
 
Lord Bowie
Member Avatar
What is the difference between a duck?

@Yurri - I'm aware of that, but that is far and away the most common occurring. And I don't see how getting free money out of what could be a bogus lawsuit being really all that devastating, it's devastating to the guy for sure, who it put on a sexual predator/rapist list, loses lots of freedom and money, and pretty much has his life ruined forever. If they actually can prove that it was done and the guy really did do it, then sweet.. but if not, it's a horrible condemnation.
Saff Profile // Kam Profile // Sadistic Profile
Posted Image
Stop by my art thread ----------------------------------------------- SUPER DA PAGE
WARNING: Above Post May Contain Sarcastic/Harsh/Stupid/Offensive/Idiotic/Blasphemous Content. Deal With It.
______________
What's the difference between a champion and a challenger.. a challenger is trying to become, a champion became.
Offline Mini Profile
 
Katsuko
Member Avatar
Sandopolis Act 1
Quote:
 
And I don't see how getting free money out of what could be a bogus lawsuit


Cost in terms of time / legal fees / scandal >>> minimal compensation awards, which are rarely given.
Posted Image
<3 All you need is love <3
Offline Mini Profile
 
Lord Master of Darkness™
Member Avatar


From my dark experience with this subject, the officials almost always tend to take her word over the man's. Just because.

Women crying wolf... ugh, don't get me fudgeing started on this.
Posted Image
Click to go to my YouTube channel - now over 1,200 subscribers!
The Gaming MoD
- a blog about gaming, by the Master of Darkness.
Other links!
Offline Mini Profile
 
Ark Rotarl
Member Avatar
Squeak
If there's not enough evidence to prove the consent of either one party, then a case like this is often dismissed unless a private detective is requested to gather more circumstantial evidence that could help one side of the case. Until such evidence can be presented to the court to be examined and further prove the plaintiff or defendant's testimony, the case would be inconclusive.
Posted Image
Offline Mini Profile
 
snow toilet
Member Avatar
Huffing Kitty Litty
This might be a really dumb question but why would a rape case be considered "interesting"?
I might not be reading the topic correctly.

Offline Mini Profile
 
Fwiss
Member Avatar
Sandopolis Act 1
Bowie
 
One thing I don't like is that two people can have consensual sex only to have one (typically the woman) claim rape far later in the future, and since the law is slanted against men in pretty much every way, the woman typically comes out of a case like that with at least something. Rape cases and divorce lawsuits, very typically, are won by the women, whether or not there is good reason behind it. It's easy money.


So true.
That's why I'm not getting married or doing any interaction with anyone.
That and I hate children.

Anyhoo, just note that the case is always innocent until proven guilty. It's more like Russell's Teacup than anything.
An other words, this man would be able to go to an appellate court if he WAS convicted. Whether or not he actually did rape her, with this evidence it is impossible to convict someone.

I've noticed a few girls in my class actively trying to get pregnant so their boyfriends can't leave them.
I'm in high school. This is what happens when America.

Just a thought, since it was related.
Sonic SCANF has a Twitter! Follow us for all your Sonic news!
Posted Image
Offline Mini Profile
 
Wallace
Member Avatar
Break out the L-word. The other L-word.
snow toilet
Sep 29 2011, 01:10 PM
This might be a really dumb question but why would a rape case be considered "interesting"?
I might not be reading the topic correctly.
What I meant was that it would be interesting to see the outcome of this particular hypothetical case. Not that rape is an interesting thing.
Join Scott Pilgrim Month!

Posted Image

Posted Image

Character Code:
Offline Mini Profile
 
`TakeCare
Member Avatar
-sigh-
Fwiss
Sep 29 2011, 01:22 PM
This is what happens when America.
That's American alright.


In a "he said she said" scenario's I always figure someone is trying to out bs the other, and in the end the female typically wins. It's a double standard.

-shrug- You can go through the evidence, but one could claim it was rough sex. I mean dominatrix could be sued for abuse, but who hears about that.
Short Blogs | Character Database | YouTube


"lurk lurk lurk lurk type type type type post post post post post"
~TakeCare
Offline Mini Profile
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Act I: Chit-Chat Hangout · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2