| ~Welcome to the Sonic Blast Community Forum~ Greetings stranger, it is an honor to have you as a visitor. Since we opened in 2006 our goal has been to offer the most authentic Sonic-themed community on the web for Sonic enthusiasts new and old. We do our best to provide the most unique features, best Sonic-themed designs, and have the latest news; always improving to cover all of your Sonic needs. Our community is full of friendly people and we hope you enjoy your brief stay but would be thrilled if you decided to join in on the fun. Being a part of our community is easy, quick, and absolutely free. Click here to join our community and enter the land of Mobius as a =SB= citizen! Citizens may log in to their account to participate in our land's conversations and access all of our features: |
| Newscast: Nanobots kill Cancer | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 29 2010, 02:05 PM (996 Views) | |
| Katsuko | Mar 29 2010, 02:05 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Sandopolis Act 1
|
Full Article I had friend on another forum show me this, and while I tend to be skeptical of so-called "breakthroughs," this looks legit to me. ![]()
Edited by Katsuko, Mar 29 2010, 02:05 PM.
|
![]() <3 All you need is love <3 | |
![]() |
|
HollyYoshi
|
Mar 29 2010, 02:13 PM Post #2 |
![]()
I object to your claims
|
Wow...if this is true, that would be a great thing for cancer paitents. |
![]() |
|
Kitm
|
Mar 29 2010, 03:05 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Lava Reef Act 1
|
That's pretty impressive. I don't think they should have this kind of treatment for smokers who have cancer, though. They had their warning. |
![]() |
|
| Phoenix-Saturn | Mar 29 2010, 03:10 PM Post #4 |
![]()
i just wwant to be beautiful for this one month
|
The only problem I see is that these nanos could be very expensive, and they could potentially malfunction and attack healthy cells. |
|
i'm actually really sorry bout this unfashionably late as alwways ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I... Am... THE WEREHOG SUPPORTER! MUHAHAHAHA! *Howl* | |
![]() |
|
| Katsuko | Mar 29 2010, 03:20 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Sandopolis Act 1
|
This is true. I don't know about the expense, but these things are definitely going to be dangerous if they attack the wrong cells or even the wrong proteins. That said, every treatment has its risks. You can be allergic to a vaccination, or have an unusually strong reaction to chemotherapy. Medicine in general isn't safe. |
![]() <3 All you need is love <3 | |
![]() |
|
| Lord Spin | Mar 29 2010, 03:24 PM Post #6 |
|
They got Freddy. Poor Freddy.
![]()
|
The fact that they have killed cancerous cells is a pretty good breakthrough in itself. Sure, it may not be perfect and could have malfunctions, but it's definitely a step in the right direction. |
![]() NEVAR FORGET
| |
![]() |
|
| Phoenix-Saturn | Mar 29 2010, 03:45 PM Post #7 |
![]()
i just wwant to be beautiful for this one month
|
True, but this has a much higher risk factor than a potential allergy, as it has the potential to affect everyone and not just a select few people in the case of an allergic reaction. |
|
i'm actually really sorry bout this unfashionably late as alwways ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I... Am... THE WEREHOG SUPPORTER! MUHAHAHAHA! *Howl* | |
![]() |
|
| Katsuko | Mar 29 2010, 03:52 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Sandopolis Act 1
|
Not really. You're assuming that all nano-bots run according to a central processor outside the host body, but actually, each nano-bot would be programmed for the individual patient, and as they break up in the blood stream after a period of time, they could not leave a given host to attack another. Because of that, nano-bot accidents would only harm the treated patient, not everyone who ever had the treatment. The real question would be the frequency of accidents, whether the risk outweighed the benefit considering the deadliness of the cancer and the availability of other effective options. |
![]() <3 All you need is love <3 | |
![]() |
|
HollyYoshi
|
Mar 29 2010, 06:10 PM Post #9 |
![]()
I object to your claims
|
I agree wholeheartedly. Let's just hope they find a way to make the risk low... |
![]() |
|
| terminallyCapricious | Mar 29 2010, 09:19 PM Post #10 |
![]()
hOnK HoNk
|
I'm always concerned with nanotechnology with regards to medicine. If there's something being injected into my body that I can't see and my immune system can't detect, how do I know it's going to leave? And from there, how do I know if, after it's stopped the affected cells, it won't start attacking healthy cells? Or even that my immune system won't catch it and make me sick trying to destroy it? In full, I don't trust man-made things touted as low- or no-risk. Hell, even the natural solution for our most basic needs are risky. I don't want to take any more risks for my survival than I need to. If I ever develop cancer, I'm not accepting this treatment until it's been tested so neurotically there isn't a hint of doubt in my mind that the risks are acceptable. |
![]() It's eternally tragic that that which is magic be killed at the end of the glorious chase. From young seals to great whales, from waters to wood, they will fall just like leaves in the wind. With perfumes and fur coats and trophies on walls, what a hell of a race to call men. Nihon Itsumademo! honk. HONK. honk. HONK. | |
![]() |
|
| Lord Bowie | Mar 29 2010, 09:33 PM Post #11 |
|
What is the difference between a duck?
![]()
|
If this turns out to work, we need to effectively end Chemo. That procedure only makes you better and ends your pain by killing you off... making the process even more painful up until the end date. I hope this is the real deal because if we can kill Cancer with methods like this, maybe they'd be effective on HIV/AIDs as well as a precise countermeasure. |
Saff Profile // Kam Profile // Sadistic Profile![]() Stop by my art thread ----------------------------------------------- SUPER DA PAGE WARNING: Above Post May Contain Sarcastic/Harsh/Stupid/Offensive/Idiotic/Blasphemous Content. Deal With It. ______________ What's the difference between a champion and a challenger.. a challenger is trying to become, a champion became. | |
![]() |
|
| Lord Master of Darkness™ | Mar 30 2010, 07:26 AM Post #12 |
![]() ![]()
|
The possibilities are endless it would seem. But as likely as it could be used as a cure, chances are it was most likely originally conceived as a weapon. And if not, people are going to come up with some messed up stuff pretty quickly. The real dark side of humanity is about to appear. |
![]() Click to go to my YouTube channel - now over 1,200 subscribers! The Gaming MoD - a blog about gaming, by the Master of Darkness. Other links!
| |
![]() |
|
| infamousDee | Mar 30 2010, 08:44 AM Post #13 |
|
Flying Battery Act 2
|
If this treatment is as substantial a breakthrough as this article portrays it to be, then I assume it would be all over the media by now. In my opinion, cancer will continue to plague humankind for years to come. |
![]() |
|
|
Neo Metallix |
Mar 30 2010, 09:55 AM Post #14 |
|
~Doomsday Overlord~
|
I agree with that. Splitting the atom was originally for good, but people turned it into a weapon. Who's to say they can't make these things airborne and target specific people? |
![]() ![]() ![]() Puncture the Porcupine, my fancharacter! | |
![]() |
|
| Katsuko | Mar 30 2010, 02:21 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Sandopolis Act 1
|
Oh, no doubt. Anything that can be weaponized will be weaponized given enough time. There's no stopping that. But, that isn't a legitimate reason for stopping the research because people will still develop nano-bot based weapons even if no legitimate researchers try to put the technology to a productive end. After all, the nuclear bomb preceded the nuclear reactor.
Maybe. But an argument from silence is a logical fallacy, and news organizations have a lot to report on, and they're not usually good about picking up the substantial stuff anyway. If we spend half our time fixated on the likes of Paris Hilton, and the other half is consumed with health-care reform, some big events are going to fall under the radar. Besides, Mark Davis is a legitimate guy with real credentials. You can look up him and ten different articles on his work on nano-medicine easy. Edited by Katsuko, Mar 30 2010, 05:33 PM.
|
![]() <3 All you need is love <3 | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Act I: Chit-Chat Hangout · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:20 AM Jul 25
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards




















































2:20 AM Jul 25