| ~Welcome to the Sonic Blast Community Forum~ Greetings stranger, it is an honor to have you as a visitor. Since we opened in 2006 our goal has been to offer the most authentic Sonic-themed community on the web for Sonic enthusiasts new and old. We do our best to provide the most unique features, best Sonic-themed designs, and have the latest news; always improving to cover all of your Sonic needs. Our community is full of friendly people and we hope you enjoy your brief stay but would be thrilled if you decided to join in on the fun. Being a part of our community is easy, quick, and absolutely free. Click here to join our community and enter the land of Mobius as a =SB= citizen! Citizens may log in to their account to participate in our land's conversations and access all of our features: |
| Add Sally and Bunny Rabot to Sonic games? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 21 2008, 06:02 AM (2,908 Views) | |
|
|
Dec 21 2008, 06:02 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Lava Reef Act 2
|
Well, I posted that topic about lacking girl characters in Sonic games, and I realized, we have two right under our own eyes, just not in Sonic Team's views. I think if Sonic Team added Sally Acorn and Bunny Rabot, then there would be two great additions in heroine characters. Elise, from what I hear failed in Sonic 06 (never played the game). Anyway, Sally is a princess, and an animal. Sonic saving Sally could account more than Sonic saving a human. I think it fits perfectly. She will also be the girl to counter Amy in the Sonic war (pending whether her love towards Sonic is changed). As for Bunny Rabot, well she has that spice, style, and power you'd want in any girl character. She could possibly rise as one of the best Sonic characters in a game. Plus, she has a great history almost being turned into a robot. You know how good of a story that could be? Anyway, reuniting these characters in a Sonic Team game seems like the best scenario to me about adding more girl characters. This is my petition to add them in. Sure, they may be changed a bit going to a Sonic Team game, but that's ok. They both have great personalities and fill in needed holes to make the games better. Petition here if you'd like to see Sally Acorn and Bunny Rabot in a Sonic game. Edited by Sonic Adventure 2, Dec 21 2008, 06:03 AM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 22 2008, 01:47 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Lava Reef Act 2
|
Sorry to double post, but I am amazed at the lack of consideration of adding these characters to Sonic games. |
![]() |
|
| Traben | Dec 22 2008, 01:53 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Hydrocity Act 2
|
No, no, no. Enough secondary Sonic characters, enough, enough, enough. It would have worked pre-Adventure series before Big, E-102, Rouge, Shadow, E-123, and so on showed up. That way maybe we would not have had so many new supporting characters. |
![]() |
|
| Lady BlizShadow | Dec 22 2008, 02:03 PM Post #4 |
|
I still can't use this.
![]()
|
I have never advocated any of the Sonic universes crossing because the worlds are so different that characterization is going to suffer to the point that it seems useless outside of the novelty of seeing these characters rendered in 3D. Knothole and the Acorn dynasty are foreign entities to the games. Eggman isn't some awesome dictator the characters have to overcome. "Zones" do not exist. The worlds are entirely different. All of the experiences that made Sally Sally and Bunnie Bunnie aren't there. As a result, Archie characters being thrust into the games will be changed to reflect these differences as were the game characters themselves when they were introduced in Archie. And considering their exclusitivity, Sega's lack of regulation concerning how they are portrayed, and Sonic Team's underwhelming writing, they will be changed to the point that they will not be the same character anymore. If this is the case, why screw up the established personalities and canons? Why not make new characters altogether since that's what you will essentially be doing by throwing these guys into the lion's den anyways? For the sake and respect of both canons, I just don't like the idea. |
![]() Because staff made me do it. =P Art Topic ~ Drawing Tutorial ~ The Seven Chaos Forum | |
![]() |
|
| Fwiss | Dec 22 2008, 02:15 PM Post #5 |
|
Sandopolis Act 1
|
I don't want to be mean, but I don't like that idea. That's just my opinion And if Sonicteam keeps making new characters, they'll eventually make a character named Jelly the Donut, and we all want to see that happen, am I right? Edited by BlizShadow, Dec 22 2008, 02:28 PM.
|
Sonic SCANF has a Twitter! Follow us for all your Sonic news!
| |
![]() |
|
| Traben | Dec 22 2008, 02:27 PM Post #6 |
![]()
Hydrocity Act 2
|
...No? Maybe they ought to put Mairo and Sonic together in a game that is actually good. Maybe that would revitalize both of those dying characters. |
![]() |
|
| Lady BlizShadow | Dec 22 2008, 02:31 PM Post #7 |
|
I still can't use this.
![]()
|
No need to double-post, Fwiss. Simply edit your original post by hitting the "Edit" button at the bottom of it. And they've already done that twice Traben unless you're advocating for a platformer crossover which I wouldn't. The mascots play too differently nowadays and the popularity gap between their styles is too big to make the experience cohesive enough for the media and perhaps even the fans to accept. An example? Sonic Unleashed. xP |
![]() Because staff made me do it. =P Art Topic ~ Drawing Tutorial ~ The Seven Chaos Forum | |
![]() |
|
| Traben | Dec 22 2008, 06:07 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Hydrocity Act 2
|
I was suggesting a good game. SSBB doesn't really count, even though it was really fun. Okay, so I'm going to scrap that idea. I think Sonic should return to his roots - Adventure 2 was a phenomenal game and Adventure 3 should stick to that formula. The six playable characters of that game each affected the story pretty much equally, unlike a previous installment (Big, you're on the chopping block), and the game had a solid plot development. Improvement in gameplay options ironically takes away from gameplay experience half the time, especially when they try to make a certain lightning bolt strike again in the same place, i.e. Mario Sunshine (which still outranks Galaxy, thank you). Let's stick to the basics, none of this fancy werehog silliness. That, people, is a gimmick. |
![]() |
|
| Agent LacenMC | Dec 22 2008, 06:41 PM Post #9 |
|
I don't know where I'm going.
|
Adding Sally Acorn and that Robot Rabbit from the Archie series isn't a good idea at all. Since people are complaining about Sonic's current state with failure's, the addition of those characters would make it worse. All these gimmicks, as Treban mentioned, are the things that put Sonic in the hole. It all started with Sonic Heroes, once you think about it, and made it's way to the newest installment, Sonic Unleashed, and I sure hope that the hype on The Black Knight lives up to it's name. All these experiments that SEGA is putting on Sonic ruins it. I have some new games, like Unleashed, and I'm telling you that the Day Time levels are phenomenal, it's just that werehog. So, adding these characters won't make the games any better. It's just another gimmick. Not as bad as a werehog, but still, bad. |
|
Facebook | Twitter | YouTube Hey there party people! I started a gaming YouTube channel! I'll be posting all my latest vids in the signature. Keep up with them! Sonic Crossroads
| |
![]() |
|
| Traben | Dec 22 2008, 06:45 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Hydrocity Act 2
|
That sounds right on the money - Heroes did not fulfill its potential, and then they went Nintendo-y on us and started putting Sonic on airs. And can we please get some well written/delivered dialogue? Is that so much to ask?! Something occurred to me just now - even if Sonic Team tried to make a game in the Archie universe, they wouldn't actually collaborate with the comic writers, and they would completely ruin the comic series for the hardcore Sonic fans. Goodbye, fanbase. Edited by Traben, Dec 22 2008, 06:47 PM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 04:34 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Lava Reef Act 2
|
I'm surprised no one likes the idea. I still like it. Bear in mind, Sally and Bunny will not retain their Mobius tides coming into the game, it will be different. |
![]() |
|
| Traben | Dec 24 2008, 06:56 AM Post #12 |
![]()
Hydrocity Act 2
|
Well, they could probably get away with sticking them in there, but not too many people would recognize them. Come to think of it, that would increase comic sales once people caught on. Maybe there is a positive side to this idea after all. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 07:22 AM Post #13 |
|
STARES
|
I hate this idea. Archie charactors don't deserve to be canon imo. If there was a throwaway Archie Sonic Vidyagame, then yeah sure, but putting Archie charactors into official timeline would make me dislike Sonic games even more. |
![]() ![]() userbars rite | |
![]() |
|
| NellieViolet101 | Dec 24 2008, 05:17 PM Post #14 |
|
Angel Island Act 2
|
The day Sally Acorn be in the games will cause the Amy/Sonic fans to have a big couple war. I don't think Bunny and Sally should be in the games because the Sonic game fans don't like the comic universe much from what I heard. I really don't want the univerises mixing either because the game canon is confusing enough. |
![]() Creativity Brigade ( My forum): http://creativitybrigade.b1.jcink.com/index.php? | |
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 25 2008, 11:36 AM Post #15 |
![]()
Lava Reef Act 2
|
It would only be two characters... I'm not a huge fan of Archie either, but these two characters can ahnge the game for the better. And then Amy would have more of a point- A Sally/Amy catfight... And Bunny Rabbot is just a great character that has a background of almost being turned into a robot. Just these two characters fit perfectly for me. Just these two. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Act III: Sonic's Game Stadium · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:45 AM Jul 25
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards



























3:45 AM Jul 25